Newsroom

20 Years On: Remembering The 9/11 Attacks

Magnum photographers documented the immediate aftermath of September 11 and the conflict that followed across two decades

Eli Reed USA. New York City. September 12, 2001. Firefighters survey the wreckage of the World Trade Center through blown-out windows of a World Financial Center building. © Eli Reed | Magnum Photos

In this piece, we look back at Magnum’s archive of photography of the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, and of America’s wars that followed in the two decades after the event. In the accompanying essay,  writer and curator Julian Stallabrass discusses the impacts of trauma on photography and visual memory. His book, Killing For Show (2020, Rowman & Littlefield), explores how photography has shaped conflict post-WWII.

Read more about Magnum’s coverage of America’s foreign policies post-9/11 in this curated collection of editorial features exploring Afghanistan and Iraq here.

This article contains images of violence and injury which may be distressing to viewers.

Steve McCurry The collapse of WTC seen from a roof at Washington Square Park and Fifth Avenue. New York City. USA. September 11, 2001. © Steve McCurry | Magnum Photos

The 9/11 attacks, staged at the mediated heart of empire, offered a remarkable opportunity to study the memory of traumatic events. The model of memory that emerges from recent studies of the brain has implications for the affinity of memory with still photography, the impact of iconic images as tied to highly memorable events, and the effects on memory of repetition and neglect in saturated media environments. These implications generally emphasize the power of the mainstream media to influence and alter remembered history.

Bruce Gilden New York, NY. 9/11/02. In the Wall Street area a man holds a miniature of the Twin Towers to commemorate the one year anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center. © Bruce Gilden | Magnum Photos
Bruce Gilden USA. NYC. 9/17/2001. A businessman holds a flag just after the stock exchange closed on its first day of operation since closing after the September 11 attacks. © Bruce Gilden | Magnum Photos
Alex Webb USA. New York City. September 11, 2001. Abandoned telephones in the Financial District. © Alex Webb | Magnum Photos

Memory should be thought of as a continual reconstruction rather than a recording. Memories are not laid down once and for all but through a process of repetition and rehearsal that continually alters them. Those that are not revisited fade, sometimes to the point of disappearance, while those that are frequently visited are reinforced and transformed—‘consolidated’, as memory science has it—and become more resistant to erasure. The conditions for this consolidation process are material and may be disrupted by physical trauma, distraction, drugs and shortage of protein. Many children growing up in Iraq under economic blockade and in the even worse conditions of the Occupation were stunted mentally as well as physically by malnutrition, which will leave a baleful genetic legacy down the generations.

Steve McCurry USA. New York City. September 11, 2001. Streets of Lower Manhattan are filled with wreckage from the collapse of the WTC. © Steve McCurry | Magnum Photos
Larry Towell USA. NYC. 9/11/2001. A dazed man picks up a paper that was blown out of the towers after the attack of the World Trade Center, and begins to read it.. © Larry Towell | Magnum Photos
Larry Towell USA. New York City. As people work around him, a minister stands amid the wreckage of the World Trade Center, seemingly dazed from the events of the day. September 11th, 2001. © Larry Towell | Magnum Photos
Thomas Hoepker USA. Brooklyn, New York. September 11, 2001. Young people relax during their lunch break along the East River while a huge plume of smoke rises from Lower Manhattan after the attack on the World Tr (...)

When a recent memory is retrieved, it is usually rich in detail and little altered by the cue that brings it back to mind. The memory of distant events is quite different, especially when it has not been much recalled. Detail is often lost, a great deal of prompting may be needed to recover it, and the properties of the retrieval cue may prominently shape what is remembered. The consolidation of revisited memories can take weeks or even years, and long-term consolidation, at the level of the entire brain system, arguably never stops, as new memories are adjusted upon each retrieval in the light of old, and vice versa.

Alex Majoli Afghanistan. Dasht-e-Qala, Northeast region. Northern Alliance troops marching. 2001. © Alex Majoli | Magnum Photos
Thomas Dworzak Iraq. Irbil, Iraqi Kurdistan. 04/09/03. Men, women and boys cheering in the streets of Irbil, celebrating "The end of the Saddam HUSSEIN Regime".They wave Kurdish, PUK and US flags, pictures of Kur (...)
Jérôme Sessini Iraq. Najaf. August 28, 2004. A civilian lies wounded on a street full of abandoned sandals as the shooting continues. Thousands of supporters of Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani are converging on Najaf (...)

Memory builds meaningful life narratives, which often falsely emphasize the unity of the subject across time and also edits out the unimportant so that we are not crippled by the sheer accumulation of detailed reminiscence, like Jorge Luis Borges’ character Funes the Memorious. The more alien the new material is to the conceptions built up in the old, the longer it takes to consolidate and the more likely it is to be forgotten or changed to match better with the subject’s more regular experiences and view of the world.

Peter van Agtmael USA. NYC. 2014. A display at the 9/11 museum at Ground Zero in New York. The museum walks a difficult line, trying to make a “neutral accounting” out of one of the most politicized events in histor (...)

One type of memory appears to have particularly photographic effects. It was first described in a 1977 study by Roger Brown and James Kulik which looked at memories that seemed to preserve or freeze detailed images of shocking events over long periods of time, apparently unchanged. They interviewed adults about how they remembered such events, including the John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., assassinations, describing the phenomenon as ‘flashbulb memories’. In these memories, episodic and source memory appear tightly melded, so that subjects vividly remember not merely the event but where and how they came to know it. Such memories also seem to have a strong affinity with the still photograph—to the extent that they were sometimes described as being like a print, static and unalterable.

Steve McCurry Work crews begin to clear the mountain of wreckage from the collapse of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers, New York, NY, September 11, 2001. © Steve McCurry | Magnum Photos
Susan Meiselas USA. New York City. September 11, 2001. Liberty Plaza. © Susan Meiselas | Magnum Photos
Alex Majoli USA. NYC. New York City two weeks after the September 11 terrorists attacks. 2001. © Alex Majoli | Magnum Photos

Unsurprisingly, whether flashbulb memories formed had a lot to do with the subjects’ view of the significance of the event, and this was tied to their group affiliations. Brown and Kulik’s sample was composed equally of black and white adults and showed sharp and predictable differences over how they remembered the assassination of King. Such findings have been repeated, showing that the 9/11 events are much more likely to be recalled as a flashbulb memory by US citizens than others.

Moises Saman Iraq. Baghdad, Iraq. July 2004. A man tries to tame an Arabian horse looted from one of Saddam Hussein's palaces in Baghdad, now being kept in the backyard of a house in the Sadr City district of B (...)
Peter van Agtmael Iraq. Outside Mosul. 2006. Soldiers raided a hamlet on the outskirts of Mosul after midnight on a winter weekend. Iraqi soldiers guarded the perimeter while a line of American soldiers moved up (...)
Alex Majoli Iraq. Baghdad. People burning and throwing stones at a poster of Saddam Hussein. April 10 2003. © Alex Majoli | Magnum Photos
Alex Majoli Afghanistan. Kabul. A Northern Alliance soldier guarding Pakistan and Taliban prisoners. 2001. © Alex Majoli | Magnum Photos

There may be a link between the shock with which the disruptive icon is first grasped and flashbulb memory. Susan Sontag, in a famous passage, wrote of first seeing photographs of Bergen-Belsen and Dachau as a child, describing the experience as a deep cut that transformed her view of the world and would stay with her for life; likewise, Han Kang who dug out from her parents’ shelves a hidden album of photographs of the Gwangju massacre. Many of us have had similar experiences, and know that there are images, fused with the experience of first seeing them, that will haunt us until death.

Mark Power USA. South Dakota. Keystone. National Presidential Waxworks Museum. President George W. Bush with firefighter Bob Beckwith at Ground Zero, New York, three days after 9/11. October 14th 2018. © Mark Power | Magnum Photos

Brown and Kulik saw flashbulb memories as fixed and accurate, but both of these qualities have been called into question by later studies. Flashbulb memories are often more persistent than others, but they do decay and fade nevertheless. While people tend to believe strongly in the truth of such vivid memories, that is no guarantee of their accuracy. For example, the Zapruder film of the John F. Kennedy assassination is what many Americans remember as if it was broadcast live or soon afterwards and was their first exposure to the news; but in fact still images from the film were first published only a week later in Life, and it was not broadcast until years afterwards. Equally, studies about the long-term flashbulb memories of the Challenger disaster show many memory errors, and no correlation between the belief in a memory’s accuracy and its actual veracity.

Peter van Agtmael Iraq. Taji Airbase, Baghdad. January 2005. Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse trial on TV. Embedded with the 44th Medical Command US Army. 86th CASH (Combat Support Hospital) in the Green Zone and 50th Med (...)
Thomas Dworzak Afghanistan. 2001. © Thomas Dworzak | Magnum Photos
Peter van Agtmael Kuwait. Ali Al Salem. 2006. Graffiti written by soldiers on the walls of bathroom stalls. © Peter van Agtmael | Magnum Photos

The flashbulb memory studies of the 9/11 events have yielded mixed results. Some show that such memories decay at the same rate as any other, while being accompanied by greater feelings of veracity. Others have shown greater durability and accuracy over long periods of time, with very few major distortions, even after several years had passed. Some memory distortions occur when different stories about the same event from various sources and times become confused (hardly surprising, given the amount of coverage), but memories of the events seem to have been laid down quickly and did not take long to consolidate. In traumatic events, high emotional arousal also seems to narrow attention on the central aspects of the matter, with the consequence that less was remembered of peripheral issues. This is similar to weapon-focusing by victims of an attack.

Peter Marlow U.S.A. New York. New York two months after the September 11th attacks. 2001. © Peter Marlow | Magnum Photos

One reason for the strength of flashbulb memories, which ties them to the social scene, is that they are likely to be discussed frequently and compared to other people’s recollections. For those who had close, first-hand experience of the attacks, and whose memories were forged by the intense arousal of the amygdala, recollection does appear to be detailed, accurate and durable. For others, the maintenance of these memories seems to be strongly associated with collective rehearsal, narration and sharing, which can itself introduce distortions.

Paul Fusco A large memorial is created with flowers, notes and photographs in memory of those lost in the Sept. 11, 2001 attack. NYC. USA. 9/18/2001. © Paul Fusco | Magnum Photos

There is little work on the effects of media on flashbulb memory. While the enhanced and vivid memories of those who experience traumatic events through the media do fade and alter, photographs can protect them, especially when seen repeatedly, and the effect is stronger for images than for words. In more usual circumstances, the general unreliability of source memory may be compounded by a media-saturated environment in which many sources are rapidly consumed. If the repetition of orthodoxies—however mendacious—does much to consolidate them in the memory, and if the omission of alternative views, or their very rare mention, drives them from the mind, then the mass media wield considerable mnemonic sway.

Bruce Gilden USA. New York City. October 2001. WTC Terrorist Attack. At the Meadowlands Arena before a Jets game. © Bruce Gilden | Magnum Photos
Larry Towell Afghanistan. Kabul. 2010. Woman in a burqua selling glamor magazines. © Larry Towell | Magnum Photos
Susan Meiselas USA. New York City. September 11, 2001. An amateur photographer on Church Street captures the collapse of Tower 2, the South Tower, of the World Trade Center at 9:55 a.m. Tower 1, the North Tower, (...)

Children have great difficulty remembering source information, which makes them particularly vulnerable to false recollection. Suggestive questioning is very effective at implanting false memories in preschool children, and when the suggestion is prolonged and repeated, they will recall the false memories with confidence and in rich detail. The same can be done for adults with the aid of manipulated photographs from their past or of fake political events. As the mass media erode the reliability of source memory, compounded by digital interfaces and the rapid consumption of diverse material, they threaten to make children of us all.

Christopher Anderson USA. Washington D.C. 2005. Scenes from the Texas Presidential Inauguration Ball. President George Bush and First Lady Laura Bush. © Christopher Anderson | Magnum Photos

Is it any surprise, then, in our accelerated media environment that the most indigestible of the 9/11 images were banished from view—in part because of the demands of the public? Or that the towers themselves disappeared from TV screens in the years after the attacks, being deleted from pre-9/11 shows in which they had often served as establishing shots? Or even more that memories of the suffering caused in Iraq registered so little?

Alex Webb USA. Las Cruces, New Mexico. September 11, 2002. Aggie Memorial Stadium for "We Remember...A Celebration of Unity." © Alex Webb | Magnum Photos
Stay in touch
Stay up to date every Thursday with Magnum photographers’ activities, new work, stories published on the Magnum website, and the latest offerings from our shop.
Be the first to know about recent Magnum Shop drops. From new books and limited editions, to special offers, you can find it all on the weekly Magnum Shop newsletter.
Get fortnightly tips and advice articles, find out about the latest workshops, free online events and on-demand courses.
Learn about online and offline exhibitions, photography fairs, gallery events, plus fine print news and activities, on a monthly basis.
Know when our quarterly 7-day square print sale is coming.
Monthly updates on the latest assignments, photographer projects and collaborations with brands.